🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising number of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has urged the legislature to pass a bill lifting the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory resolution calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is given. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful foundation," commented a leading parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately weakened. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have raised concerns. One foundation established by the loved ones of a young person who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a prominent peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, legislation is mostly occurring at the local government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation capping under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed laws mandating guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to mimic this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Outside of the West, other nations are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world agencies take a more cautious stance. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could backfire". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to improve safety.

As this international debate evolves, the policies of the Australian government and others demonstrate that states around the world are no longer prepared to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.